Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Otter, Governor of Idaho (2015) 2015 U.S. Dist. Lexis 102640 Page 108 in the textbook
1. Next, write a 3-4 page paper addressing the following questions:
o Break down the judge’s analysis of Idaho’s challenge: Does the Idaho law outlaw speech based on its content? Was there a compelling reason for the law’s passage? Why/why not?
o What are the examples of "compelling reasons" for the government to suppress speech?
o What is "political speech"? In what way does this case involve political speech?