In the context of decolonization in Africa, the statement "had few leaders with government experience" can be understood as a consequence of the limited investment in education in African colonies during the colonial period. This lack of investment resulted in a shortage of well-educated individuals who could take on leadership roles in the government post-independence.
Here's a breakdown of why each of the other options is not as directly related to the lack of investment in education:
1. "had far too few teachers for their universities": This statement highlights a deficiency in the education system regarding the availability of teachers for universities, but it does not directly address the issue of leadership experience needed for governing a newly independent nation.
2. "had many skilled workers with little education": While this option acknowledges the presence of skilled workers, it does not specifically address the shortage of leaders with government experience, which is crucial for effective governance and decision-making.
3. "had many overqualified workers in menial jobs": This statement suggests a mismatch between the qualifications of workers and the nature of the jobs they are engaged in, but it does not directly relate to the scarcity of experienced leaders needed to guide the newly independent African nations.
Therefore, the most relevant choice that directly connects to the lack of investment in education and its impact on leadership is "had few leaders with government experience." This option reflects the historical reality of how colonial policies influenced the educational opportunities available to Africans, ultimately shaping the pool of individuals capable of assuming leadership positions during the decolonization process.
